Dermatologist Mind : Usefulness of Patch Testing and Measures of Disease Frequency (incidence and prevalence)

Dermatologist Mind : Usefulness of Patch Testing and Measures of Disease Frequency (incidence and prevalence)

Patch testing remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of ACD (Devos & Van Der Valk, 2002; Uter W et al, 2009). Quality control of patch testing is both a prerequisite for, and an objective of, clinical epidemiology of contact dermatitis. Continuous development of test standards concerning the composition of test series, test concentration, and vehicle and standardization of test readings is provided by the national and international research groups on contact dermatitis.

Many studies in contact dermatitis are based on populations that have been patch tested; usually this means that the participants visited a clinic or a hospital for being evaluated on having contact dermatitis. There are a variety of types of irritant reactions - some can look identical to allergic reactions. The recognised convention for recording patch test reactions is as follows:

+/− doubtful: faint erythema only + weak: erythema, maybe papules ++ strong: vesicles, infiltration +++ extreme: bullous IR: irritant

Measures of disease frequency (incidence and prevalence)

The epidemiologist deals with necessity of data on defined populations. The most basic setting giving rise to epidemiological data is the evaluation of the occurrence of a disease in the presence of an exposure. The exposure may be present or absent and the disease may be present or absent.

Measures of disease frequencies include prevalence, which is the amount of disease that is already present in a population; incidence, which refers to the number of new cases of contact dermatitis during a defined period in a specified population; and “incidence rate” (IR), which is the number of non-diseased persons who become diseased within a certain period of time, divided by the number of person-years in the population. All measures of disease frequency consist of the number of cases as the numerator, and the size of the population under study as the denominator.

Sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic instruments used are important. In epidemiological studies, an overestimation of prevalence can result from low sensitivity/specificity. The three most important types of observational study in the epidemiology of contact dermatitis are follow up studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies. In follow up studies, selection of subjects is based upon exposure to the factor of interest. Instead of exposure, the presence or absence of a risk factor (e.g. nickel allergy, or atopy) can also be chosen as basis for comparison.

In case-control studies, the subjects are selected according to their disease status. Information on the past exposure of the persons with contact dermatitis (cases) and the non-diseased persons (controls) is collected. In cross-sectional studies, a study population is selected regardless of exposure status or disease status (in contrast to case-control and follow-up studies).

Data on the incidence and prevalence of occupational dermatoses are scarce. The most important sources of data are occupational disease registries, case series of patients visiting dermatology clinics, and a limited number of cross-sectional studies in one or more occupational groups.

Thanks For Visiting ! Keep Your Healthy !